On 3/20/2012 11:26 AM, TSchneider wrote:
> there may not be simple correspondence to 'classes/concepts' (01)
I'm sorry that I did not respond to this part in my previous note. (02)
My recommendation is to take relations as fundamental. All other
terms are defined by relations. A class is defined by a monadic
relation and its extension in some domain. (03)
If there are any terms in some Kn Rep. language that don't have simple
definitions in terms of relations, there is a very simple solution: (04)
That usage is DEPRECATED. (05)
See my note on Natural Semantic Language in Ontolog Forum. (06)
John (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (08)
|