Hi Sherri, (01)
Thanks. (02)
Sorry about the somewhat messy message earlier (I was rushing off to
start a virtual event), which I have cleaned up below. (03)
We'll look forward to collaborating with you and the ORWG in the future. (04)
Regards. =ppy
-- (05)
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:31 AM, De Coronado, Sherri (NIH/NCI) [E]
<decorons@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Many thanks, Peter!! Understood about the content. Sherri (06)
> On 12/1/11 12:18 PM, "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [updated]
>
> Hi Sherri,
>
>
> Of course. The current implementation of OOR is
> at: http://sandbox.oor.net/
>
> That said, I will have to concede that there is not much there, because
>
> * except for some cosmetic modifications (one slight change to
> categories too, I believe), it is running [straight] BioPortal v2.6 now
>
> * we asked content providers (ontology owner) to take everything out,
> in preparation for the upgrade to the ncbo-appliance v0.4 (the few
> ontologies still there are from the Spatial Ontology folks because
> they had presentations to do in the interim.
>
> * we have yet to integrate any new code developed (e.g. for
> gatekeeping, federation, etc.) to the BioPortal codebase
> ** ... but when they [start] to get in, we will put that
> implementation out as a separate instance (we call that our
> "devbox") at: http://dev.oor.net
>
> But, yes ... OOR should always [be] open!
>
>
> Regards. =ppy
> -- (07)
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:59 AM, De Coronado, Sherri (NIH/NCI) [E]
> <decorons@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> Any chance that we could get access to your sandbox to peek at your current
>implementation?
>> Thanks, Sherri (08)
>> On 11/17/11 2:20 PM, "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Stuart & All,
>>
>> We didn't quite get to your question 8 ...
>> //
>> 8. ... I would also ask OOR if there are plans to update the
>> "Communique" and request for formal adoption of a new version in the
>> near future. If so, what are expected changes/additions?
>> //
>>
>> My take is: the communique represents a snapshot in time (therefore,
>> the OntologySummit2008_Communique) will stay the way it it. We might
>> as well look at the "OOR Initiative" and all its current and future
>> developments, as the living, breathing extension of those ideas,
>> community commitment and conviction now.
>>
>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>> -- (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (010)
|