oor-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oor-forum] OOR Logo Poll (first round) - Results: TwoFinalistsEmerg

To: Ali Hashemi <asaegyn@xxxxxxxxx>, Yuriy Milov <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: OpenOntologyRepository-discussion <oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:35:02 -0700
Message-id: <BANLkTi=-3Caz4XASf660u9MazcRB-C1oyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Ali, Yuri and All,    (01)

I am a bit behind in following-up on this matter.    (02)

(As some of you might know) I have been traveling out-of-the-country
for the last couple of weeks. I am back in California now, but am
still recovering from the trip. Therefore, allow me to pick up on this
after this weekend.    (03)

Regards.  =ppy
--    (04)


On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Yuriy Milov <qdone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Peter, Ali, and All,
>
> My last (final) solution for OOR logo attached.
>
> I have returned to a simple text ("Open Ontology Repository") combined with
> the asymmetrical symbol (related to the OOR abbreviation and some more
> hidden ideas). Such symbol could be also used separately (for example, for
> special buttons, so on) as soon as it is recognized as the OOR symbol.
>
> I vote for this solution because it shows the OOR ambition to become
> a standard approach as well as a symbol ("a head on X") for the future
> semantic age.
>
> Do we have such ambitions?
>
> If yes - let's vote for this logo-simbol!  :)
>
> From the other side, I really enjoy the Ali's graphic job and I will be glad
> to see any of his solutions as the winner.
>
> Thanks Ali for the great contribution!
>
> Regards
> Yuri    (05)


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ali Hashemi
> To: Peter Yim
> Cc: OpenOntologyRepository-discussion
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 6:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] OOR Logo Poll (first round) - Results:
> TwoFinalistsEmerged!
> Hi Peter,
> Sure, it can be one design. Good point about the spacing, I bit the bullet
> and just stretched the text instead of trying to mess around with the
> kerning.
> As for colour, I am indifferent, leaning to Green, Blue or White/Blue.
> As can be seen in the attached picture that is not a logo, most web logos
> are situated in the Blue and Red hues, very few are in the Green. So it
> would definitely be a unique choice.
> Green is more vibrant, lifelike and associated with the environment and
> earth. Blue in my mind is associated with stability, authority and calmness.
> I think either would be a good choice for OOR.
> The rationale behind the icon is that it is a Hasse diagram for a Boolean
> lattice. It is an easily recognizable figure and reflects to some degree the
> structure of how ontologies are stored in OOR and hints at the lattice of
> theories. Imo, it speaks to users of the OOR.
> In terms of font, I went with something that was more techie, namely Agency
> FB. It might not be the most immediately recognizable choice, but it is
> unique and looks (to my eye) a bit futuristic. I am not particularly happy
> with any of the fonts though... I would be happy to change it if someone
> feels strongly about this point.
> I`m not sure what is meant by "line art" so I have not included that.
> Attached, please find Green, Blue and Grey-scale versions of the acronym and
> the logo. (If I've understood correctly then, all three comprise one
> design?)
> Best,
> Ali    (06)


> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, Ali.
>>
>> AA.  May I suggest, then, you enter this as one design (and we vote on
>> that as one choice) ... specifying
>>
>> 1. there will be variation on the design to accommodate different
>> applications, such as
>>
>> 1.1  your (final) choice of a logo color, font, and, of course
>> graphics ... in the two formats: with the OOR acronym, as well as that
>> with the fully extended name.
>>
>> 1.2  that you (optionally) also present the use of that logo in line
>> art, grey scale, or even allow variation to your choice of color (say,
>> in the case of a drop-in to the BioPortal software)
>>
>>
>> BB.  Now (just for your consideration) my personal choice, among the
>> fonts and layouts you offered, I think the one in the "oorgreen"
>> design looks best (coherent, well proportioned and most intelligible
>> ... I'd rather not see the OOR characters spread too wide apart.) As
>> for colors, I know the drop in (for the existing code) should be blue,
>> but I do like you Olive color the best too (I guess "green" is in!)
>>
>> I hope you can still see this message, and make a response if the
>> above arrangement for your submission of this as ONE design sounds ok
>> to you (even if you will not be able to work on anything else,
>> graphically, until after Jun-6.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & regards.  =ppy
>>
>> p.s.  Yuri: you might consider the above too ... in particular, having
>> a submission with something that is suitable for a drop-in for the
>> OOR-sandbox (ref. how the current "BioPortal" Logo is implemented at:
>> http://bioportal.bioontology.org/) would be most useful.  =ppy
>> --    (07)


>> ---------- original message ----------
>> From: Ali Hashemi <ali@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] OOR Logo Poll (first round) - Results:
>> TwoFinalists Emerged!
>> To: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>> Attached please find 4 variations on the boolean theme for the OOR
>> logo - one with a white, blue, green and red backgrounds. I also
>> created little logos of just the lattice + the acronym. I'm not sure
>> how voting ought work as the four varieties might engender vote
>> splitting.
>> I will be without access to internet, phone or any other communication
>> device until June 6, 2011.
>> Best,
>> Ali
>> --
>>
>>
>> (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,.,    (08)


>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks, Yuri, Terry and Ali, (not that I make the rules here ... I only
>> > suggested them earlier, and no one objected.)
>> >
>> >
>> > Yuri and Ali are correct, the "two" finalists are just variations of the
>> > same design ... and, presumably, the finalized design may probably be
>> > rendered in different variations (say, when printed on a light background
>> > vs. a dark background).
>> >
>> > Since Ali is in favor of including "Milov-1" as a finalist too, so here
>> > goes: (unless someone objects within the next 24 hours) our finalists are
>> > "Hashemi-4," "Hashemi-c" and "Milov-1" (with the possibility that
>> > "Hashemi-4" and "Hashemi-c" may end up as either one or two entries in the
>> > final round, as AliHashemi desires.)
>> >
>> > Good luck, Ali & Yuri!
>> >
>> > Keep the comments and suggestions coming in, everyone!
>> >
>> >
>> > Best regards.  =ppy
>> > --    (09)


>> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Ali SH <asaegyn+out@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I agree with the above sentiments -- the two leading logos are really
>> >> variations on the same theme. It might be more useful to have an option
>> >> between two distinct logo styles.
>> >> On that note - the colours and fonts are really quite easy to change.
>> >> Do people have a preference for a blue or white or red (or whatever 
>colour)
>> >> background. Similarly, do people have a preference for which font is used?
>> >> I'm open to suggestions - please send them along!
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Ali    (010)


>> >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:38 AM, terry.longstreth
>> >> <terry.longstreth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> As one who voted for all 3, I'd agree with Yuriy, but I think we'd
>> >>> need a ruling from Peter.   He set up the rules to allow us to move on
>> >>> without looking back.  None of us really considered the possibility that 
>the
>> >>> first vote would ultimately all but decide the final question.
>> >>> Terry    (011)


>> >>> Yuriy Milov wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi All
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks all who voted for "Milov-1" candidate.
>> >>>
>> >>> BTW I see that both finalists are the variation of same Ali's idea, so
>> >>> I
>> >>> have one more idea - to move 3 my additional votes to the "Milov-1"
>> >>> candidate as it would bring more intrigue to the next step  ;)
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyway I am pretty sure the Ali's idea will win, so congatulatoins to
>> >>> Ali -
>> >>> the great job! :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Yuri    (012)


>> >>> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
>> >>> To: "OpenOntologyRepository-discussion" <oor-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 11:02 AM
>> >>> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] OOR Logo Poll (first round) - Results:
>> >>> TwoFinalists
>> >>> Emerged!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear All,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Re: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR_Logo_Candidates
>> >>>
>> >>> Here are the results of our first poll on the OOR Logo designs ...
>> >>>
>> >>> * candidates "Hashemi-4" and "Hashemi-c" were selected as finalists,
>> >>> each with 6 votes
>> >>>
>> >>> * right behind them were: "Milov-1" with 4 votes, as well as "Ding-1"
>> >>> and "Hashemi-a" each with 3 votes
>> >>>
>> >>> * we had 13 participants casting a total of 35 votes all together
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ... Congratulations, Ali!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> A huge THANK YOU to everyone who submitted designs, and appreciations
>> >>> to those who took the time to review and vote on them.
>> >>>
>> >>> The next step is for the finalists (looks like its Ali Hashemi
>> >>> competing with himself here) to tweak and package up the design for a
>> >>> final poll, when the community will, again, vote to adopt one (out of
>> >>> the two) "OOR Logo" design.
>> >>>
>> >>> Between now and Thu 2011.05.26 - 9:00pm PDT, the community is welcome
>> >>> to provide our designer(s) with suggestions on the final tweaks
>> >>> (although, it will be up to the designer to make the final call on how
>> >>> he/she wants to do it.) Please do so by replying to this thread
>> >>>
>> >>> After that we will run another poll and pick our OOR Logo.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks & regards.  =ppy
>> >>> --    (013)


>> >>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear All,
>> >>>
>> >>> The first round of polling for the OOR Logo is now open.
>> >>>
>> >>> As discussed earlier (ref.
>> >>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/2011-05/msg00030.html#nid05 )
>> >>> the top two (2) logo designs will be shortlisted for further
>> >>> refinement. (After which we will go into a final polling round to
>> >>> determine which design will get adopted as the OOR Logo.)
>> >>>
>> >>> Please goto the page with all the candidate designs:
>> >>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR_Logo_Candidates
>> >>> Then open another window for the polling form:
>> >>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/OOR-Logo/Poll/poll-01.html
>> >>> ... and following the instructions there.
>> >>>
>> >>> This polling round will close at 9:00pm PDT on Thu 2011.05.19 ...
>> >>> please vote NOW!
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks in advance for your participation. Post any question you may
>> >>> have to this thread, or to me offline (if it is not something most
>> >>> others would want to know about too.)
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards. =ppy
>> >>> --    (014)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/  
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository     (015)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>