|To:||Ontology Summit 2007 Forum <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:27:37 -0400|
Thank you for posting this interpretation. This also reflects the enterprise architecture interpretation, the innovation life cycle interpretation, and a generic business perspective. I think your comments help us to see that there is significant room for refinement of these dimensions.
Unless we can better define these dimensions in terms of their variables or factors, any evaluation will simply by one person's interpretation and subjective judgment call versus another person's.
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontology-summit] first draft of the Ontology Summit 2007 Communique, Bill Andersen|
|Next by Date:||[ontology-summit] OntologySummit2007 has been a great success! ... Please endorse the Communique, Peter Yim|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontology-summit] Descriptive vs. Prescriptive, paola . dimaio|
|Next by Thread:||[ontology-summit] OntologySummit2007 has been a great success! ... Please endorse the Communique, Peter Yim|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|