Dear Paul, (01)
Thank you very much for your contribution. I have linked that to the
session page, as community input on the topic - see:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2013_10_10#nid3YJR (02)
... while you cannot be with us in real time, participating in the
dialog asynchronously (via this mailing list) is definitely one of the
ways we hope the community would engage in. (03)
(You're probably already aware) We do archive the full proceedings of
these virtual panel sessions (which will includes all slides,
in-session chat-transcript, audio recording of the session, etc.) and
make it openly available online ... you will be able to find it at the
session page - under:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2013_10_10#nid3YG3
- in a day or two after the event, in case you or anyone wants to
catch up, or revisit the material. (04)
Hope you will be able to join us, in person, in future sessions on
this, or related topics. (05)
Best regards. =ppy (06)
Peter P. Yim
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PeterYim
-- (07)
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Paul Brandt <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Peter, Dear all,
>
> I first would like to thank the organizers of the session for doing a great
> job of initiating these sessions as well as each time delivering an
> interesting agenda!
>
> Unfortunately I am not able to attend the upcoming session. Therefore I
> would like to contribute to the open discussion with the following:
>
> Resulting from the PhD-research that I am currently conducting, we have
> proposed an ontology, ContoExam, to support semantic interoperability in
> sensor network - sensor applications [1], that addresses not only quantities
> and their measurements (as defined by the VIM3 [2]) but extends this to
> include quantities that cannot be expressed in magnitudes, e.g.,
> examinations of properties such as blood type, as proposed by Dybkaer [3].
> In addition, we included context [4] since that is highly relevant to
> support correct interpretation towards the use of the quantity/property.
>
> Note that this work should be considered "research" and not a standard, or
> in the process of being standardized. Still both points, i.c., (i) the VIM
> baseline might prove too narrow, and (ii) the need for context, may be
> pertinent to what the QUOMOS ontology standard should/could deliver.
>
> If you might have questions to these points I'm happy to answer these
> offline. I wish you a fruitful session and expect to collaborate with you
> the next session again!
>
> Best
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Ir. P. (Paul) Brandt (1,2)
>
> 1: Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Delft, The
> Netherlands
>
> 2: Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
>
> T +31 (0)88 866 70 56
>
>
>
> Abstract of our paper [1] - Much effort has been spent on the optimization
> of sensor networks, mainly concerning their performance and power
> efficiency. Furthermore, open communication protocols for the exchange of
> sensor data have been developed and widely adopted, making sensor data
> widely available for software applications. However, less attention has been
> given to the interoperability of sensor networks and sensor network
> applications at a semantic level. This hinders the reuse of sensor networks
> in different applications and the evolution of existing sensor networks and
> their applications. The main contribution of this paper is an ontology-based
> approach and architecture to address this problem. We developed an ontology
> that covers concepts regarding examinations as well as measurements,
> including the circumstances in which the examination and measurement have
> been performed. The underlying architecture secures a loose coupling at the
> semantic level to facilitate reuse and evolution. The ontology has the
> potential of supporting not only correct interpretation of sensor data, but
> also ensuring its appropriate use in accordance with the purpose of a given
> sensor network application. The ontology has been specialized and applied in
> a remote patient monitoring example, demonstrating the aforementioned
> potential in the e-health domain.
>
>
>
> [1] P. Brandt, T. Basten, S. Stuijk, V. Bui, P. de Clercq, L. F.
> Pires, and M. van Sinderen, “Semantic interoperability in sensor
> applications”, in 2013 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence,
> SSCI 2013. Proceedings, Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and
> e-health, IEEE Symposium on (CICARE2013), 2013.
>
>(http://www.es.ele.tue.nl/~tbasten/papers/CICARE2013%20-%20Brandt%20et%20al%20-%20Semantic%20interoperability%20in%20sensor%20applications%20-%20final%20version.pdf)
>
> [2] “JCGM 200 : 2008 International vocabulary of metrology — Basic
> and general concepts and associated terms ( VIM )”, in Joint Committee for
> Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 2) - International Bureau of Weights and
> Measures, Paris, France, 2008.
>
> [3] R. Dybkaer, An Ontology on Property for Physical, Chemical, and
> Biological Systems. Copenhagen, Denmark: Faculty of Health Sciences,
> University of Copenhagen, 2004.
>
> [4] P. Dockhorn Costa, G. Guizzardi, J. A. Almeida, L. F. Pires,
> and M. van Sinderen, “Situations in Conceptual Modeling of Context”, 10th
> IEEE Int Ent Dist Obj Comp Conf WS (EDOCW'06), 2006. (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-based-standards/
Subscribe: mailto:ontology-based-standards-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-based-standards/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologyBasedStandards/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologyBasedStandards (09)
|