Corpus Ontologists All,
This paper is billed as an ontology of emotions:
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1096/paper22.pdf
is a paper describing an ontology of emotions with two nice features. The words used to name emotional states are kept in a separate vocabulary from those used to detail conversations. The ontology is reasonably shallow, but it has an XML representation spec, and is based on a plurality of polar opposite pairs. Here is the image using a two dimensional projection of the emotion values:
It refers to a description of EmotionML, which is apparently a W3C standard, yet is flexible enough in naming conventions to be applied in many taxonomic contexts, IMHO. Below is the W3C page, which also speaks XML:
http://www.w3.org/TR/emotionml/
Has anyone used EmotionML, or used corpora which apply antipolar pairs of emotion states as the model? Did you get good results, or were there unanticipated obstacles, as usual?
-Rich
Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Cooper
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 11:32 AM
To: '[ontolog-forum] '
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] The Lindenbaum lattice and a biography of Adolf Lindenbaum
I still can't raise the URLs at the two Greek
sites you listed. Is there a better reference for
belief revision you would suggest? A google
search on "belief revision tutorial" led me to two
hits that might be good ones:
http://scandinavianlogic.org/material/BaltagSmets-
lectures1+2.pdf
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_revision
-Rich
Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John F Sowa
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 12:52 PM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] The Lindenbaum
lattice and a biography of Adolf Lindenbaum
Rich,
For any logic L, and any set of sentences S in L,
the closure Cn(S)
is the set of all sentences that are entailed by
S.
There is a question about provability (turnstile
operator) or
semantic entailment (double turnstile). For FOL,
those two versions
coincide. Since Tarski developed his systems for
versions of FOL,
you can assume either version.
That Stanford article is not well written. I
admire your tenacity
in digging through it, but the author chose to
throw in too much
verbiage and symbols. This is a case where more
is less. And
less would have been more.
John
__________________________________________________
_______________
Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-f
orum/
Unsubscribe:
mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePa
ge#nid1J
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J