[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] fitness of XML for ontology(WAS: [ontology-summit] T

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Price <dprice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:55:26 +0000
Message-id: <9EFFF8CE-6141-481A-BDC7-507E60A9488A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 4 Feb 2014, at 14:45, John F Sowa wrote:

Paul, Rich, and Kingsley,

I want to emphasize that the entire family of *ML languages
(GML, SGML, HTML, XML...) have definitely proved their value
for word processing, formatting, and annotating texts.

But a notation that is good for one purpose might not be good
for other purposes.

Bob DuCharme, as usual, tells the story nicely:


Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>