ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Why a data model does not an ontology make

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:49:21 -0400
Message-id: <51599E71.1090904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 3/31/13 9:55 AM, John F Sowa wrote:
> For point #1, RDF + SPARQL is just YADM -- Yet Another Data Model.
> It has few advantages and many disadvantages over data models that have
> been in use for decades.  I have no objection to YADM if people find it
> useful, but I have serious objections to edicting any single data model
> as a requirement for the Semantic Web.    (01)

John,    (02)

RDF is just a framework for constructing entity relationship graphs 
endowed with machine-comprehensible entity relationship semantics. Did 
the Semantic Web folks pitched this whole vision poorly? Of course they did.    (03)

SPARQL is just a declarative query language that's totally superior to 
SQL for intensional interaction with data. Basically, we are looking at 
a contemporary variant of Quel [1] that incorporates many of Codd's 
concerns with SQL [2].    (04)

Linked Data (which you don't mention above, but is a source of the 
latest Semantic Web's poor marketing practices) [3] is the piece that 
enables Web-scale super keys via de-referencable URIs that resolve to 
URI referent descriptors (or description documents) that bear RDF based 
content in the form of entity relationship model based description graphs.    (05)

Interoperability and heterogeneity is baked into the Semantic Web stack, 
as exemplified by its Linked Data underpinnings. IMHO. The only thing 
wrong with all of this is horrible marketing driven by misguided 
zealotry around the letters "R-D-F"  .    (06)

A Semantic Web of RDF/XML is as dead as XML itself.    (07)

A Semantically enhanced Web of Linked Data loosely with ontologies is 
growing in leaps and bounds by the minute :-)    (08)

Links:    (09)

1. 
http://infolab.cs.unipi.gr/pre-eclass/courses/db/db-post/readings/Ingres-TODS-1976.pdf    (010)

-- Ingres Whitepaper
2. http://www.cs.duke.edu/courses/spring03/cps216/papers/date-1983.pdf 
-- Codd's criticism of SQL
3. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html -- point #3 isn't well 
articulated and remains a point of concern due to easy misinterpretation.    (011)


--     (012)

Regards,    (013)

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen    (014)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>