Hi all,
I have basic some question about part-whole and subsumption for
conceptual modeling with ontologies. (01)
Usually, the most foundational theories to express relations between
concepts are subsumption and part-whole.
When one use only subsumption, we are ascribed to introduce associations
with arity since properties are not always
rigid.
Alternatively, when one use only part-whole relations, arity is provided
within the theory using rules.
Is it possible to avoid arity-based associations if one use both
part-whole and subsumption?
Richard (02)
--
And the wounded skies above say
it's much too much too late.
Well, maybe we should all be praying for time. (03)
richard_dapoigny.vcf
Description: Vcard
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|