To: | ankesh@xxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:42:20 -0500 |
Message-id: | <1e89d6a40902200742h28f3a800mb48907a3abc3d14a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Ankesh -- Good questions. Unfortunately, there is more than one model theoretic semantics for negation as failure. (Apt-Blair-Walker stratified model, stable model,...) Fortunately, I'd guess that all of your statements are indeed valid under most of the above. If Pat Hayes is watching, I'd expect an erudite contribution from him real soon (:-) Hope this helps, -- Adrian Internet Business Logic A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English over SQL and RDF Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free Adrian Walker Reengineering On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Ankesh Khandelwal <ankesh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dear Ontolog-members, _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Validity of laws of predicate logic under CWA and NAF, Ankesh Khandelwal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology, John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Validity of laws of predicate logic under CWA and NAF, Ankesh Khandelwal |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Validity of laws of predicate logic under CWA and NAF, Ed Barkmeyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |