ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] FW: [UNCEFACT-TMG-CC - 110] CCTS V3.0 Draft for our disc

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:50:18 -0800
Message-id: <C1FF235A.8596%dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
FYI
-- 
**********************************************************
Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.           *
Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee    *
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com                    *
Music: http://www.mix2r.com/audio/by/artist/duane_nickull*
**********************************************************    (01)

------ Forwarded Message
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:47:10 -0800
To: UN/CEFACT TMG-CC <UNCEFACT-TMG-CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Conversation: [UNCEFACT-TMG-CC - 110] CCTS V3.0 Draft for our discussion on
Monday
Subject: Re: [UNCEFACT-TMG-CC - 110] CCTS V3.0 Draft for our discussion on
Monday    (02)

Did you ever address the comments from the Ontology Forum?    (03)

Duane    (04)


On 2/18/07 5:17 AM, "Stuhec, Gunther" <gunther.stuhec@xxxxxxx> wrote:    (05)

> Hello all, 
>  
> I got from Mark the cleaned up CCTS V3.0 draft that we will use for our
> discussion and next steps, on Friday night. @Mark, thank you very much for
> your excellent and extraordinary work.
>  
> Please have a look to the CCTS V3p0 draft - especially to the editors's
> comments on the appropriate places (use the Word's review view, please)
>  
> Especially sections 1-6,8 and the definitions are complete and ready for the
> team review. 
>  
> The draft should reflected:
> 1) all comments from the last review addressed
> 2) rules created to replace all storage rules
> 3) rules created to match each aspect of the metamodel
>  
> There are a number of ambiguities which still require resolution.   Especially
> the metamodel questions and those drive the other changes should be focused on
> Monday. We need a consistent and agreed metamodel, before section 7 will be
> finalized. The metamodel decision may require substantive impact in several
> rules of section 7. Those changes will be incorporated next week, and then
> modified as the team works through the questions.
>  
> Please  also  note that in many cases  Mark has inserted rules that may or may
> not be required depending on the final interpretation of the metamodel.
>  
> Additionally, the comment log requires updating and the cross-reference
> between 3.0 and 2.01 rules requires creation.
>  
>  Kind regards,
>  
>     Gunther     (06)

-- 
**********************************************************
Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.           *
Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee    *
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com                    *
Music: http://www.mix2r.com/audio/by/artist/duane_nickull*
**********************************************************    (07)

------ End of Forwarded Message    (08)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (09)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ontolog-forum] FW: [UNCEFACT-TMG-CC - 110] CCTS V3.0 Draft for our discussion on Monday, Duane Nickull <=