Responding inline below: (01)
ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:36:33 -0400 (EDT): (02)
>Today's telecon notes included:
>
>
>
>>Pat will rewrite the program for Protege 2.1, but this probably will only
>>be able to start after the 9/9/04 Semantic Technology conference
>>(ref:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_08_19#nid039)
>>
>>
>
>[EvanW] Do you think it is wise to aim at 2.1 when they have already released
>a
>beta for 3 and are aiming their future plugin upgrades toward this release?
>
>
[ppy] my understanding that a lot of the version 3 beta is connected
with their upgrade in their GUI, which the Protege project folks told us
about at their conference last month. It should be safe to develop based
on the current release (and not the beta). (03)
[ Ray or Jennifer -- would love to see your comment on this! By the way,
it would be real nice if some/one of you from the Protege project team
you could join us here at ontolog (even as a observer). You are hereby
cordially invited. -ppy ] (04)
>
>
>
>>Ontolog's representation at the 9/8/04 "2nd Semantic Technology for eGov
>>Conference" Executive Briefing Panel
>>(ref:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_08_19#nid047)
>>
>>
>
>FYI - I also plan to attend this meeting. It could be quite interesting.
>
>-Evan
>
>
[ppy] sounds great! Put in a good word for us, and get people to come
participate at Ontolog! (05)
Regards. -ppy
--
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (06)
|