fyi ... (01)
Mark Crawford's response to a question from James Sanders on the
ebxml-dev list, on OASIS' point of view regarding UN/CEFACT's pulling
out of ebXML development (ref:
http://slashdot.org/articles/04/02/23/0623212.shtml), and on how that
would impact the future of ebXML. (02)
Great answer, Mark & UN/CEFACT CCTS working group! (03)
-ppy (04)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: UN/CEFACT and future of ebXML
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:52:16 -0500
From: CRAWFORD, Mark <MCRAWFORD@xxxxxxx>
To: <James.Sanders@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ebxml-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (05)
Sorry for the late reply, but havingI just returned from the recent
CEFACT Forum meeting in Bonn where we continued work on ebXML Core
Components Technical Specification and voted to submit that
specification to ISO TC154 along with the other ebXML specifications
that were just approved as ISO specifications should sufficiently
answer the question. (06)
Mark (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|