To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | MDaconta@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:04:49 EDT |
Message-id: | <12a.2e2619b4.2c4982b1@xxxxxxx> |
Hi Everyone, In order to rectify the various models and definitions of "Invoice", we need to settle upon a single use case that we will fully specify and refine in order to judge each aspect of a model against its support for that use case. This is one way we could rectify the various models and come to a single Invoice ontology. At the last conference call, the attendees agreed that the first use case proposed (validating an invoice for both internal consistency/ correctness and against an order if one is referenced) is the best one to start with. I have created a placeholder page for discussion/refinement of the use case at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UseCasesInvoiceValidation If you do not like the above use case, feel free to suggest a better one. Remember, silence means consent (St. Thomas Moore). Hopefully this can be resolved by the next phone conference so that we can move on... Talk to you soon, - Mike --------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] UBL/Ontology 7/17/2003: Discussion items, Monica J. Martin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next Action -- Selecting/refining a single use case, Monica J. Martin |
Previous by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] UBL/Ontology 7/17/2003: Discussion items, Monica J. Martin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Next Action -- Selecting/refining a single use case, Monica J. Martin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |