Folks, (01)
While investigating an issue brought to our attention by Tania
Tudorache, I had noticed that all of you address here may have had a
recent post to [ontolog-forum] not getting delivered. The situation is
as follows: (02)
As part of the means to combat spammers, our mailing list is configured to: (03)
(a) not accept[1] a post when it is via "b.c.c." ... we only accept
those that are sent "To:" or via "c.c." (04)
(b) not accept[1] when there are more than 10 recipients in the mail envelop. (05)
[1] message "not accepted" for delivery and archive are nominally
held up for vetting by the list-owner. However, since 99+% of those
message are actually spam messages, we hardly ever really go about
vetting those messages. We usually just let them expire (in a day or
two) and let the system purge them. (06)
Therefore, kindly *re-post* your messages, and try to avoid running
into the above.
Sorry for the inconvenience. I hope you have not caused you undue delay. (07)
Thanks & regards. =ppy (08)
Peter Yim
Co-convener, Ontolog (09)
P.S. Todd, please re-post post your <iswc2009publicity@xxxxxxxxx>
message from your <tschneider@xxxxxxxxx> address. =ppy
--
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (010)
|