iaoa-swao
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [iaoa-swao] SWAO SIG July 7 meeting?

To: IAOA SemanticWeb-AppliedOntology SIG <iaoa-swao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Obrst, Leo J." <lobrst@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:06:07 +0000
Message-id: <FDFBC56B2482EE48850DB651ADF7FEB035215272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks much, Frank. Sure, I understand the infrastructure replacement hell 
you've been going through (along with Valter and Oliver) for IAOA, trying to 
set things up outside of Peter Yim's old infrastructure.    (01)

Best of luck!    (02)

Thanks,
Leo    (03)

>-----Original Message-----
>From: iaoa-swao-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iaoa-swao-
>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frank Loebe
>Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 5:55 PM
>To: 'IAOA SemanticWeb-AppliedOntology SIG'
>Subject: Re: [iaoa-swao] SWAO SIG July 7 meeting?
>
>Hi Mike and all,
>
>
>> I have been working on the assumption of a July 7 (first Monday) meeting.
>
>That fits what was discussed in the last meeting.
>
>
>> So I guess we need to get the notice out tomorrow (Wednesday).
>
>Yes, that'd be reasonable.
>
>
>> Again we should use the previous agenda as the basis for this one. Any
>> additions / tweaks to the agenda over and above that?
>
>I think we should mention again the new status of relevant IAOA
>infrastructure issues, especially conference bridge, mailing list, and
>website.
>
>
>> I see we haven't posted the "outcome" notes from this meeting and I don't
>> have them to hand,
>
>I have just distributed them, being sorry for the time taken.
>
>
>> but I recall offering my (EDM Council's) GoToMeeting in
>> the absence of anything else for this month's call.
>
>Yes, you did. Meanwhile, matters develop in a way where IAOA will be
>providing the conference bridge for a few more months, at least. There are
>some administrative problems that have delayed implementing that, but I
>believe that should be available on July 07. If so, there will be new call
>data which I'm not yet aware of.
>
>Against this background, I propose to announce the meeting on Wed, Jul 02,
>but leave the call number/Skype contact and the related PIN still open.
>Another message can update call details before the meeting, where we could
>then use the "usual" conference bridge (via new access, I expect). Only if
>this does not turn out to materialize, we may fall back to your GoToMeeting
>account. (Note: the [iaoa-swao] archive is publicly accessible, i.e., we may
>need to be careful with your GoToMeeting call data, if it should be
>distributed.)
>
>
>on meeting notes:
>
>Eventually, I need to state a follow-up on note-taking vs. distributing
>edited notes of meetings. While I'm happy to try and take notes _during_ a
>SWAO SIG meeting in which I'm present, unfortunately I cannot volunteer to
>provide the edited notes afterwards. (I think I haven't made this clear
>enough at the beginning last time, therefore I have now produced the edited
>version of last time, given the expectation that that was assigned to me.)
>I'm sorry, the delay was unintended, but I already have more workload of
>this type than I can reasonably cope with. Hence I'm forced to avoid
>additions to that stack.
>
>Thanks and best regards,
>Frank
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: iaoa-swao-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iaoa-swao-
>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Bennett
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:46 AM
>> To: iaoa-swao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [iaoa-swao] SWAO SIG July 7 meeting?
>>
>> I have been working on the assumption of a July 7 (first Monday) meeting.
>>
>> So I guess we need to get the notice out tomorrow (Wednesday).
>>
>> Again we should use the previous agenda as the basis for this one. Any
>> additions / tweaks to the agenda over and above that?
>>
>> I see we haven't posted the "outcome" notes from this meeting and I don't
>> have them to hand, but I recall offering my (EDM Council's) GoToMeeting in
>> the absence of anything else for this month's call.
>>
>> Let me know if someone has a preferred alternative before about mid-day
>> Eastern time tomorrow, otherwise I propose we go with that this time. This
>> has the disadvantage that some corporate firewalls (a minority) don't work
>> with it, and it's not a long term solution as it's not my own to hand out,
>> and it has a limit of 25 attendees.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>__________
>Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-swao/
>File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/SIG/SemanticWeb-AppliedOntology/
>SIG Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IAOA_SWAO_SIG
>Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!)
>To join: please email the SIG conveners or to: info[at]iaoa.org
>IAOA website: http://iaoa.org    (04)

___________________________________________________________________________ 
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/iaoa-swao/ 
File-share: http://iaoa.cim3.net/file/work/SIG/SemanticWeb-AppliedOntology/
SIG Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?IAOA_SWAO_SIG 
Activities Blog: http://iaoa-activities.blogspot.com/ ...(coming!) 
To join: please email the SIG conveners or to: info[at]iaoa.org
IAOA website: http://iaoa.org     (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>