Bob & Kurt, (01)
Thanks. Appreciate the effort to put more work on the draft
presentation. Let's make sure the key tenets of our NHIN-RFI
response thesis gets conveyed too. -ppy (02)
All, (03)
We never documented our mission in this exercise ... therefore, I
went ahead and did a first draft for this immediate effort: (04)
"Joint Ontolog-SICoP Pilot / Demo / Presentation -- to convey
to policy makers, the thesis of Ontolog's NHIN-RFI response, and
to explore how SICoP & Ontolog can better contribute,
collaboratively, to the NHIN initiative." (05)
It's posted at:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?HealthOntologyMapping#nid0269 (06)
Feel free to comment and suggest enhancements. (07)
Cheers. -ppy
-- (08)
Bob Smith wrote Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:24:52 -0800:
> Peter,
>
> Your telephone call made explicit the gaps in our assumptions.
>
> Pat Cassidy's important contributions of using the case of TIME for
> illustrating the value propositions of a common upper ontology for
> architects does need more explicit treatment in the PPT files we present.
>
> Kurt and I are planning to work on this topic of time later today.
>
> Bob
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/health-ont/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/health-ont/NHIN-RFI/
To Post: mailto:health-ont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?NhinRfi (09)
|