bsp-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [bsp-forum] A different spin on Services

To: "'BSP Forum'" <bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Bob Smith" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:26:44 -0700
Message-id: <002401c8db08$c2bcbef0$6401a8c0@BobDell>

Hi Toby,

 

Spins on Services and Building Performances may eventually fit together.

 

Using your example:  after these services have been so defined (Encapsulated Objects with little need for process detail, just the message inputs) the conversations around Service Performance Measurement will occur. After the Tidal Wave Alert, for example, certain City Beach Building’s performance and potential service improvements, would occur at the appropriate local levels.

 

I-----

Cheers,

 

Bob


From: bsp-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bsp-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Considine, Toby (Campus Services IT)
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 1:50 PM
To: BSP Forum
Subject: [bsp-forum] A different spin on Services

 

Recognizing Services:

As part of another conversation, relating the CAP alert system that is replacing the emergency broadcast system, and the desire to be able to send CAP alerts directly to buildings….

In the ideal system, CAP alerts would go out from whatever source, whether national or regional, whether intelligence or police. Each CAP alert would contain many types documents, each intended for different markets. One of those document types would be the building response, which would have two components. One component would be the informational component, the terse public explanation of the alert. One component would be the simple response type, or what Michelle and I call service, that we expect from the building. The service request would be generic, irrespective of the actual building and its capabilities.

The facility master system integrator (FMSI), the trade responsible for integrating the low level building systems for interaction with the enterprise, would be responsible for defining each services the building was expected to perform. The FMSI has the local knowledge of each building, and the missions housed therein. The possibly national entity sending out the CAP alert would not know the details of every building / outdoor athletic facility / airport / civic center / ….

Within the generic realm of Emergency response, we can imagine the building offering weather response services for responding to Ice Emergency Alerts, Tornado Touchdowns Alerts, Tidal Wave Alerts, Flood Alerts, et al. In some regions, such as the Midwest, insurance premiums could be lower for a building with an approved response plan for Tornado Alerts, but no Tidal Wave Alert response would be in place. On the coast, the opposite might apply.

 

 


"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." -- David Thoreau


Toby Considine

Chair, OASIS oBIX TC
Facilities Technology Office
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC

  

Email: Toby.Considine@ unc.edu
Phone: (919)962-9073

http://www.oasis-open.org
http://www.NewDaedalus.com

 

 


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/bsp-forum/   
Subscribe: mailto:bsp-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/bsp-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/BSP/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>