OntologySummit2014: (Track-B) "Making use of Ontologies: Tools, Services, and Techniques" Community Input workspace (44KA)
Track Co-champions: ChristophLange, AlanRector (44KB)
Mission (44KC)
link to Mission Statement: T (44KD)
see also: OntologySummit2014_Ontology_Tools_Services_Techniques_Synthesis (44JZ)
Community Input Solicited (44KE)
Please add your input as one-liners or short paragraphs, in bullets below, and make sure your include your name and date at the end for attribution, tracking and following-up purposes. Thanks. -Track-B co-chairs (44KF)
- Ref. thread started by ChristophLange on 2014-01-21 (44KG)
- Are today's ontology tools really Semantic Web aware? Do supporting URI identifiers and description logic really suffice? (44K0)
- A point raised by BobbinTeegarden in http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_02_20: (46U0)
- Would love URLs to visualization tools. The one's I've seen present 'isA' trees, which don't really show the rich ontology around them. In the presence of the plethora or Big Ontologies, it would be great to see a target item plus a few 'rings' out from that focal point, with the ability to refocus on other things presented. (46U1)
- A point raised by BobbinTeegarden in http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_02_20: (46U0)
- How can existing tools and techniques be evolved to maintain a high quality of service in the face of Big Data? Or do we need new tools and techniques? (44K4)
- A point raised by TimFinin in http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_01_16: (4439)
- Here's a question I think we must address: Many big data applications require or invite statistical and probabilistic models and reasoning. How can/will we address this? (443A)
- ... (44K5)
- A point raised by TimFinin in http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_01_16: (4439)