OntologySummit2010: Present "Content" - community input (25F2)
This is the workspace for community input to the focused discussion outlined below ... (25F3)
Track Label: Content - Subtrack Label: Present (25F4)
Track Co-champions: ArturoSanchez and AntonyGalton (25F5)
Mission: The track mission is to survey the existing provision of ontology education with regard to curricular content. (25F6)
Pertinent questions: (25F7)
- Which educational programmes are there, if any, which are mainly or entirely devoted to ontology and related topics? (25F8)
- Within other educational programmes, what modules/courses are there which are mainly or entirely devoted to ontology and related topics? (25F9)
- Are there any other programmes or modules/courses with sufficient ontologically relevant content? (25FA)
- Are there curricular models (a.k.a. curricular guidelines) that include ontology-related topics? (25FB)
Discussion: (25FC)
Comments / Feedback on Survey Questions which target Curricular Content Presently: Please add your comments/feedback below (indented as shown by the sample entry below; kindly identify yourself and date you input too, for proper attribution and follow-up purposes.) (25MJ)
- Semsphere http://www.semsphere.com/ (an Austrian SME) delivers training and 3-levels certifications in Semantic Technology which includes ontology (semantic web-oriented) as a central element (http://www.semsphere.com/en/training/certifications). This is 'endorsed' (accredited?) by STI International http://www.sti2.org/. (-PierreGrenon / 2009.12.22-09:20 GMT) (25WO)
- Dear Dr. Galton and Sanchez-Ruiz, I have just completed the survey about the ontology content & quality. Not all relevant information fitted in the available boxes, and in the final comments of the survey I mentioned I would send a file separately, which is attached to this email. The contents of the file was motivated by a question by a researcher at the University of Havana who wanted to develop their own "ontology engineering" course, and what we had on offer that may be of use for their prospective course. It was written about a year ago, but the only substantive update is that the first sentence of section 2.1 has now been addressed (very partially) by part 2 of the Semantic Web technologies course; the other gaps remain. Looking forward to the outcome of the survey and the summit. Best regards, Maria. (-MariaKeet / Sent by email on 01-20-10; 6:41AM EST / KRDB Research Centre Faculty of Computer Science; Free University of Bozen-Bolzano; Piazza Domenicani 3; 39100 Bolzano; Italy; email; web; home; blog) (27HO)