OntologySummit2007: OntologySummit2007_Survey individual responses    (XK1)

OntologySummit2007_Survey/Response input from MillsDavis    (XK2)

Please make sure you refer to the OntologySummit2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input. T    (XK3)


Question 1 Respondant Info    (XK4)

      Name:  Mills Davis    (XK5)

Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)    (XK6)

      [  ]  Formal ontology communities
      [X]  Semantic Web communities
      [  ]  Linguistic communities
      [  ]  Concept Map community
      [  ]  Topic Map community
      [X]  SEARCH communities
      [X]  Web 2.0 communities
      [  ]  Thesauri community
      [  ]  Taxonomy communities
      [  ]  Metadata communities
      [  ]  XML communities
      [X]  Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
      [  ]  System Architecture communities
      [  ]  Biomedical communities
      [  ]  Standards Development communities
      [X]  Other (please specify):  Industry Research    (XK7)

Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):    (XK8)

      [  ]  1. Formal ontology communities
      [  ]  2. Semantic Web communities
      [  ]  3. Linguistic communities
      [  ]  4. Concept Map community
      [  ]  5. Topic Map community
      [  ]  6. SEARCH communities
      [  ]  7. Web 2.0 communities
      [  ]  8. Thesauri community
      [  ]  9. Taxonomy communities
      [  ]  10. Metadata communities
      [  ]  11. XML communities
      [  ]  12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
      [  ]  13. System Architecture communities
      [  ]  14. Biomedical communities
      [  ]  15. Standards Development communities
      [X]  16. Other (please specify):  Web 3.0    (XK9)

Question 2b Specific Community    (XKA)

      or sub-community I am affiliated with:  Co-Chair of Federal CIO Council's Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice (SICOP)    (XKB)

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:    (XKC)

      [  ]  1. informed layman
      [  ]  2. practitioner
      [  ]  3. expert
      [X]  4. other (please specify):  Industry Analyst    (XKD)

Question 3a Ontology Value -    (XKE)

      "Value of ontology is:  

       1. Capability to deal with problems of sense-making, collaboration, 
          interoperability, scale, complexity, security, personalization, 
          change & versioning, performance, and cost of net-centric solutions.  

       2. New modes of user experience that are ubiquitous, intelligent, 
          adaptive, anticipatory, and context-aware as boundaries between 
          cyber and real worlds converge and interpenetrate.  

       3. New categories of adaptive, autonomic, and autonomous systems 
          that know, learn, and reason as people do."    (XKF)

Question 3b Ontology Issues -    (XKG)

      ""Ontology for Dummies."  We are working with individuals, organizations 
       and communities of interest. Within these groups there is plenty of expertise 
       and experience expressing thoughts, meanings and values in language of one form 
       or another (written, formal, visual, gestural, etc.) We need 
       semantic user interface(s) that empower groups with diverse skills to 
       easily collaborate (exploiting the knowledge representation they already 
       know how to do...e.g. write, model, design, program, etc.) to create, manage, 
       share knowledge, and put it to work."    (XKH)

Question 3c Ontology Problems -    (XKI)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XKJ)

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -    (XKK)

      "1.  Semantic user experience & semantic social computing — most researchers, 
           ontologists and semantic web types are clueless. The Web 2.0 crowd 
           has a clue, but lacks the right technology. Focusing here will 
           jump-start multi-billion dollar markets.   

       2. Semantic processing — Three key challenges are:   

          (a) reasoning more than logical truth or falsity 
              e.g., dealing with causality, conflict, uncertainty, and diverse 
              value systems,   

          (b) hi-performance (& easily programmed) semantic processing across 
              multi-core, multi-thread, grid, mesh, and parallel environments, and   

          (c) semantic processing at web scale."    (XKL)

Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XKM)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XKN)

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XKO)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XKP)

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -    (XKQ)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XKR)

Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XKS)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XKT)

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XKU)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XKV)

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -    (XKW)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XKX)

Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XKY)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XKZ)

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XL0)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XL1)

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -    (XL2)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XL3)

Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XL4)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XL5)

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XL6)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XL7)

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -    (XL8)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XL9)

Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XLA)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XLB)

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XLC)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XLD)

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -    (XLE)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XLF)

Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XLG)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XLH)

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XLI)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XLJ)

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -    (XLK)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XLL)

Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XLM)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XLN)

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XLO)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XLP)

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -    (XLQ)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XLR)

Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XLS)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XLT)

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XLU)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XLV)

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -    (XLW)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XLX)

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,    (XLY)

 a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the OntologySummit2007 
 initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during 
 the workshops and the written communique process), and    (XLZ)
 a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting 
 member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective 
 of this OntologySummit2007,    (XM0)
      [  ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of OntologySummit2007
      [  ]  I will consider endorsing the OntologySummit2007 communique. Please send it to me for 
              review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.
      [  ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for 
              OntologySummit2007 (details below).    (XM1)

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:    (XM2)

      Organization Name:  Project10X
      Link (url) to Logo:  http://www.project10x.com/downloads/MDdownloads/MDlogos/P10X_lockup_web.jpg    (XM3)