OntologySummit2007: OntologySummit2007_Survey individual responses    (XDN)

OntologySummit2007_Survey/Response input from MichaelGruninger    (XDO)

Please make sure you refer to the OntologySummit2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input. T    (XDP)


Question 1 Respondant Info    (XDQ)

      Name:  Michael Gruninger    (XDR)

Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)    (XDS)

      [X]  Formal ontology communities
      [X]  Semantic Web communities
      [  ]  Linguistic communities
      [  ]  Concept Map community
      [  ]  Topic Map community
      [  ]  SEARCH communities
      [  ]  Web 2.0 communities
      [  ]  Thesauri community
      [  ]  Taxonomy communities
      [  ]  Metadata communities
      [  ]  XML communities
      [  ]  Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
      [  ]  System Architecture communities
      [  ]  Biomedical communities
      [X]  Standards Development communities
      [  ]  Other (please specify):  (Not Answered)    (XDT)

Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):    (XDU)

      [X]  1. Formal ontology communities
      [  ]  2. Semantic Web communities
      [  ]  3. Linguistic communities
      [  ]  4. Concept Map community
      [  ]  5. Topic Map community
      [  ]  6. SEARCH communities
      [  ]  7. Web 2.0 communities
      [  ]  8. Thesauri community
      [  ]  9. Taxonomy communities
      [  ]  10. Metadata communities
      [  ]  11. XML communities
      [  ]  12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
      [  ]  13. System Architecture communities
      [  ]  14. Biomedical communities
      [  ]  15. Standards Development communities
      [  ]  16. Other (please specify):  (Not Answered)    (XDV)

Question 2b Specific Community    (XDW)

      or sub-community I am affiliated with:  upper and domain ontology subcommunities    (XDX)

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:    (XDY)

      [  ]  1. informed layman
      [  ]  2. practitioner
      [X]  3. expert
      [  ]  4. other (please specify):  (Not Answered)    (XDZ)

Question 3a Ontology Value -    (XE0)

      "support for semantic integration and automated reasoning"    (XE1)

Question 3b Ontology Issues -    (XE2)

      "lack of rigorous ontologies for various domains  intractability of reasoning"    (XE3)

Question 3c Ontology Problems -    (XE4)

      "development of new ontologies  verification and validation of  existing ontologies"    (XE5)

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -    (XE6)

      "more coordination among existing research groups"    (XE7)

Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XE8)

      Term:  ontology
      Gloss:  vocabulary with specification of the meaning of the terms
      Reference (citation/url):  Uschold and Gruninger 1996
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XE9)

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XEA)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [X]  5. 5 - almost always    (XEB)

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -    (XEC)

      "This definition is intended to capture both the informal and formal 
       approaches to ontology. The differences between these approaches are 
       determined the language used to specify the meanings of the terms."    (XED)

Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XEE)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  Process Specification Language
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  http://www.mel.nist.gov/psl/    (XEF)

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XEG)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [X]  5. 5 - almost always    (XEH)

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -    (XEI)

      "PSL is a formal ontology axiomatized in Common Logic.  
       It is applied to support semantic integration among 
       process-related software applications, and it is also 
       applied to support automated reasoning (such as 
       verification of the consistency of business processes 
       and web service discovery)"    (XEJ)

Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XEK)

      Term:  formal ontology
      Gloss:  Vocabulary of terms together with a set of expressions 
              in a formal logic (with syntax and model theory)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XEL)

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XEM)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [X]  5. 5 - almost always    (XEN)

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -    (XEO)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XEP)

Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XEQ)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XER)

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XES)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XET)

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -    (XEU)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XEV)

Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XEW)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XEX)

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XEY)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XEZ)

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -    (XF0)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XF1)

Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XF2)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XF3)

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XF4)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XF5)

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -    (XF6)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XF7)

Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XF8)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XF9)

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XFA)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XFB)

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -    (XFC)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XFD)

Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:    (XFE)

      Term:  (Not Answered)
      Gloss:  (Not Answered)
      Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
      Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
      - Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)    (XFF)

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?    (XFG)

      [  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
      [  ]  2. 2 - rarely
      [  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
      [  ]  4. 4 - quite often
      [  ]  5. 5 - almost always    (XFH)

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -    (XFI)

      "(Not Answered)"    (XFJ)

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,    (XFK)

 a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the OntologySummit2007 
 initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during 
 the workshops and the written communique process), and    (XFL)
 a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting 
 member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective 
 of this OntologySummit2007,    (XFM)
      [  ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of OntologySummit2007
      [  ]  I will consider endorsing the OntologySummit2007 communique. Please send it to me for 
              review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.
      [  ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for 
              OntologySummit2007 (details below).    (XFN)

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:    (XFO)

      Organization Name:  (Not Answered)
      Link (url) to Logo:  (Not Answered)    (XFP)

--
This page is maintained by: PeterYim
Please forward any modification and update, along with the change justification) to him for posting. T    (XFQ)
Individual's input pages should only be changed by by the above designated maintainer, or the individual himself/herself.
Please append any (non-typo) modification at the bottom of the each page, leaving the original survey input intact. T    (XFR)