UBL-Ontology Project Conference Call - Thu 2003-07-31 (74D)
Conference Call Details (74E)
- Subject: [ubl-ontology] project conference call Thu 2003-07-31 (74F)
- Comments/Agenda: (74G)
- (74H)
- Agenda Comments: ... build rapport; ... sync up; ... distribute, assign or arbitrate virtual ownership of tasks; ... and use it to deal with emergencies. ... plus, member suggested agenda items. (74I)
- Please post you suggested agenda items if you would like to see anything put onto the agenda (74J)
- please post or upload any material to be shared to the list, to the wiki or by ftp upload prior to the meeting (74K)
- VNC session will be started 5 minutes before the call at: http://vnc2.cim3.net:5800/ (74L)
- During the call, please browse the wiki page at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Conference_Call_2003-07-31 (74O)
- (74H)
- Date: Thursday, July 31, 2003 (74P)
- Start Time: 10:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time (74Q)
- End Time: 11:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time (74R)
- Dial-in Number: 1-702-851-3330 (Las Vegas, Nevada) (74S)
- Participant Access Code: "030731#" (74T)
Attendees (74U)
- Attendees: (74V)
- Regrets: (754)
- TimMcGrath (at UBL Montreal meeting) (755)
Agenda Ideas (756)
Agenda & Proceedings (757)
1) Welcome (758)
- KurtConrad took the chair and welcomed everyone (759)
2) Appointment of secretary to take minutes (75A)
3) Roll-call of participants (75C)
4) Communication logistics & work protocols (75E)
a. Ontology browser (75F)
- (75G)
5) Status on use cases (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UseCases) (75M)
a. PO / Invoice reconciliation (address and representation mapping dropped) (75N)
- (75O)
- further discussion/debate pertaining to whether LineItemID needs to be captured in the ontology was made (75P)
- Adam sees this as being an implementation issue (75Q)
- the group agreed to capture it anyway (will someone summarize the arguments on the discussion forum, please) (75R)
- Adam further clarifies that the consensus was that implementation issues such as ID numbers, would be captured in separate documents that relate the structure of a legacy model to the ontology and vice versa. (see post) (75S)
- further discussion/debate pertaining to whether LineItemID needs to be captured in the ontology was made (75P)
b. "Persona" approach (75T)
- (75U)
- KurtConrad suggested we look at making use of it. An article can be found at: infotoday.com (75V)
6) Formalization activities (75W)
a. Variations in definition of invoice concept (75X)
b. UBL reference documents (75Y)
c. SUMO mapping (75Z)
d. MILO mapping (760)
e. Protege versions (761)
f. Judging representations (764)
- (767)
- JohnYunker told us that he is also working on a Order / Invoice relationship exercise (768)
- one can create a mapping slot on protege (769)
- (76C)
- PatCassidy purports that we can still have a compatible Maybe less expressive) representation in Protege (76D)
- (76E)
- MikeDaconta suggested we start a wiki page to thrash this out - logic representation vs frame in general, and KIF vs protege in particular, for our work in particular (76F)
- Adam will start the page (76G)
- Peter suggests we start off from http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Methodology (76H)
- sections on "Representations of Choice" and Tool of Choice" have been created. See http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Methodology#nid0103 (76I)
- start on the new pages "OntologyRepresentation" and "ToolsOntology" as appropriate (76J)
- Adam will start the page (76G)
- MikeDaconta suggested we start a wiki page to thrash this out - logic representation vs frame in general, and KIF vs protege in particular, for our work in particular (76F)
7) Workshop (76K)
- workshop on tools and technology is put on hold for now (76L)
8) Possible face-to-face meeting (76M)
9) Sponsorship and funding (76R)
- discussion postponed (76S)
10) Other business (76T)
- none (we actually ran out of time and never got this far.) (76U)
11) Next meeting date and adjourn (76V)
-- notes taken by PeterYim in real time on the wiki ppy / 2003-07-31_11:40am PDT (76Y)