Ontolog invited Speaker Presentation - Dr. Steven Newcomb - Thu 2004-06-10 (28M)
Conference Call Details (28N)
- Subject: [ontolog] Invited Speaker Presentation - SteveNewcomb - Thu 2004-06-10 (28O)
- Agenda / Comments : (28P)
- Agenda: Dr. Steven Newcomb will be giving a talk at this session titled "Ontological Engineering and the Topic Maps Reference Model" (28Q)
- VNC session will be started 5 minutes before the call at: http://vnc4.cim3.net:5800/ (28R)
- view-only password: "ontolog" (28S)
- if you plan to be logging into this shared-screen option (which the speaker may be navigating), and you are not familiar with the process, please try to call in 5 minutes before the start of the session so that we can work out the connection logistics. Help on this will generally not be available once the presentation starts. (28T)
- Information relating to this session is shared on this wiki page: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2004_06_10 (28U)
- Date: Thursday, June 10, 2004 (28V)
- Start Time: 10:30 AM Pacific Standard Time (28W)
- End Time: 12:00 AM Pacific Standard Time (28X)
- Dial-in Number: 1-702-851-3330 (Las Vegas, Nevada) (28Y)
- Participant Access Code: "0686564#" (call PeterYim at +1(650)578-9998 if you have dial-in problems) (28Z)
Attendees (290)
- Attended: (291)
- Expecting: (29H)
- Regrets: (29J)
- LisaSeaburg (29K)
- TimMcGrath (29L)
- SteveRay (29M)
- MichaelUschold (Boeing) (29N)
Agenda & Proceedings (29O)
Dr. Steven Newcomb will be giving a presentaion entitled "Ontological Engineering and the Topic Maps Reference Model" (29P)
SteveNewcomb will talk extensively about the Topic Map Reference model and describe how Topic Maps provide an important marketing opportunity for ontologists, in part because they provide an elegant way to both separate mission-specific ontologies and provide a straightforward path to integration. (29Q)
Overview of June 10 Teleconference (29R)
First of all, here's what the teleconference is *not* about: (29S)
- It's not about "Topic Maps", if "Topic Maps" means "an ISO standard XML vocabulary". (29T)
- It's not about "Topic Maps", if "Topic Maps" means "topics, occurrences, and associations" (the so-called "TAO" view of "Topic Maps") (29U)
- It's not about "Topic Maps", if "Topic Maps" means the so-called "Topic Maps Data Model". (29V)
- It's not about "Topic Maps", if "Topic Maps" is supposed to invoke any particular ontology (even including ontologies that are wedded to the Web, or to particular ways of understanding the significance of URIs and/or RDF, or any particular Upper Ontology, Standard, Suggested, or otherwise). (29W)
Instead, this teleconference is about Topic Maps. (Topic maps are probably not what you think they are.) (29X)
Fundamentally, the Topic Maps paradigm is a philosophy, an attitude, and a terminology designed to enable a kind of transparency that powerfully enables very broad transparency. (29Y)
- Philosophically, the Topic Maps paradigm reflects the drinking of much philosophical Kool-Aid, from Plato to Wittgenstein. It's consistent with Popper and Hayek. It recognizes that categories are important, but it does not insist that support for class-instance relationships (or any other kind of relationship) are always an essential or appropriate feature of every ontology. It recognizes that logic is important for inferencing, but it does not insist that any particular kind of logical inferencing is essential for knowledge representation, interchange, or integration. It recognizes that the Web is fabulously important to the cause of global knowledge interchange, but it does not insist on any doctrine regarding what constitutes a Resource, or what a URI signifies, or, indeed, on the primacy of the internet as the one true communications medium. Philosophically, the Topic Maps paradigm aims to allow and encourage people to communicate as if they are on intimate terms with the ineffable, context-free truth, but it insists that, in order to allow their communications to be integrated into in the broadest possible mainstream of human communications, they adapt their communications to the reality that communication is impossible outside of a community that shares a context. (29Z)
- The Topic Maps attitude is simply that all knowledge integration must, first and foremost, be based on disclosable ways of deciding whether any given pair of subject reifiers reify the same subject. (2A0)
(People who are primarily interested in knowledge integration, and who are infected with the Topic Maps attitude, eventually find it strange that some knowledge representations, such as RDF, do not require utterances to make commitments about which subjects are intended to be treated as reified, and which are not intended to be treated as reified. They can also have negative reactions to representations that cannot face up to the idea that a certain kind of subject must be able to be granted all the privileges of reification, including that all of its reifiers must be allowed to be viewed collectively, as if there were only one reifier for that subject.) (2A1)
- The Topic Maps terminology, which is today most carefully developed in the Topic Maps Reference Model, is designed to facilitate disclosures intended to allow things that are identified in a given universe of discourse to be understood as being the same as things that are identified in the same universe of discourse. This sounds a bit tautological and perhaps even trivial, but its implications are significant. Universes of discourse can be invented for the purpose of encompassing multiple other universes of discourse. By exposing the magic tricks specific to each universe of discourse -- the tricks that allow computers to behave as though they can recognize sameness-of-reified-subject within a given universe -- we can invite larger universes of discourse to incorporate the tricks of multiple smaller universes. When this happens, the reifiers of subjects that used to be isolated in their separate universes become wormholes between their respective universes. It's the beginning of a useful level of knowledge integration among previously separate human contexts. Maybe it's a basis on which independent knowledge integrators can make a business of contributing to the integration of human knowledge. (2A2)
So, is the Topic Maps Paradigm really any different from any other approach to the problem of global knowledge integration? You'll have to reach your own conclusion on that question. Some people, anyway, think it represents progress, if only because its checklist of things that have to be disclosed is so short, so semantically wide-open, and so potent in its ability to modularize and integrate diversity. (2A3)
Session Format: (2A4)
- The session will start with a brief introduction of the attendees (10 min.) (2A5)
- Presentation (45 min.) (2A6)
- Open discussion (30 min.) (2A7)
About the Speaker: (2A8)
Steven R. Newcomb (srn@coolheads.com) is a consultant with Coolheads Consulting in Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. (2AA)
Dr. Newcomb edited and drafted ISO/IEC 13250:2000 and :2003, the Topic Maps International Standard, which is also known as "XTM" ("XML Topic Maps"). His standards work currently focuses on the Topic Maps Reference Model. Dr. Newcomb also edited the ISO Hypermedia/Time-based Structuring Language ("HyTime", ISO/IEC 10744:1992 and :1997), and the ISO Standard Music Description Language (ISO/IEC 10743:1996). (2AB)
Dr. Newcomb was an Associate Professor at Florida State University from 1980-94. There, he co-founded and co-directed the FSU Center for Music Research, using "Centers of Excellence" funding from the Florida Legislature. The CMR's research umbrella included psychomusicology, music therapy, and the development of hardware and software systems for music instruction. Research partners included the University of Illinois's Computer-based Education Research Laboratory and Lucasfilm. (2AC)
Dr. Newcomb served as CEO of TechnoTeacher, Inc. (Rochester, New York and Dallas, Texas) from 1994-2000. During that time, TechnoTeacher pioneered the implementation of the ISO HyTime standard, creating its HyMinder, HyBrowse, and GroveMinder software library products. GroveMinder's licensees include major aerospace, telecom, computer systems, and other businesses, and civilian and military agencies of national and state governments. (2AD)
Dr. Newcomb founded and co-chairs the annual IDEAlliance conference series now known as "Extreme Markup Languages" now in its eleventh year. The next "Extreme" will be held August 2-6, 2004, in Montreal, Canada (www.extrememarkup.com). (2AE)
Logistics & Proceeding (2AF)
- The presentation can be access by pointing your web browsers to: (2AG)
- http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/resource/presentation/Ontological_Engineering_and_the_Top_Maps_Reference_Model--SteveNewcomb_20040610/ (2AH)
- these slides are also available at: http://www.coolheads.com/SRNPUBS/ontolog040610/ (2AI)
- A few additional useful links from his talk include: (2AJ)
- ... Steve: please add here ... (2AK)
The draft Reference Model, which is about to undergo another transformation, can be found at http://www.isotopicmaps.org/TMRM/TMRM-latest-clean.html The current version dates from last December. It includes the "Assertion Model" for reifying relationships (we discussed this basic TMA briefly in the telecon). The next version will clarify its TMA-ness. (2AL)
To see the topic maps that we made at Susan Turnbull's behest (and that Susan mentioned during the telecon), go to http://www.coolheads.com and press the button marked (2AM)
Integrated Conference Proceedings: Egov OpenSource and SecurE-Biz (2AN)
My contact information: srn@coolheads.com +1 540 951 9773 (2AO)
- From SusanTurnbull - Here's the draft article I mentioned about our experience with the topic map pilot led by Michel Biezunski from Coolheads - Aggregating Information Across Individual Agencies and E-Gov Initiatives with Topic Maps: Introduction to an Agile Intergovernmental Collaboration Tool with Implications for Citizen Relationship Management (2AR)
- If you have questions for the presenter, we appreciate your posting them here: (please identify yourself) (2AS)
- Session adjourned 12:02pm PDT (2AT)