uos-convene
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [uos-convene] Suggestions for structuring the Tu Mar 14 meeting

To: "Upper Ontology Summit convention" <uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321" <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:11:04 -0000
Message-id: <A94B3B171A49A4448F0CEEB458AA661F02B9984A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Michael,    (01)

This is a high level map, not a detailed one, so you read it that if
the same symbol appears in more than one box on a row, then a similar
approach was taken in those subject areas (at the best one might have
copied from another). If it is a different symbol, then it means there
is a significant difference in approach.    (02)

The result would give you a good idea of where it might be useful to
try to merge ontologies, and where you need to map between them.    (03)

I don't think axioms would add anything to this.    (04)

Of course, at a lower level you would need to map (or merge) particular
terms from one ontology to another (a many to many mapping potentially).
Now here I see the point of axioms. However, the purpose immediately is
to assess what is worth that (considerable) effort.    (05)

Regards    (06)

Matthew    (07)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Michael
> Gruninger
> Sent: 03 March 2006 15:08
> To: Upper Ontology Summit convention
> Subject: Re: [uos-convene] Suggestions for structuring the Tu Mar 14
> meeting
> 
> 
> Hello Matthew,
> 
> you're going to have to tell me what the diagram means.
> What are the sentences you are referring to?
> 
> How do you know that concept X in one data model means the same
> as concepy Y in another?
> 
> Without axioms, this will get nowhere ...
> 
> - michael gruninger
> 
> West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321 wrote:
> 
> > The diagram IS an ontology (symbols standing in relation to one 
> > another that make a number of sentences). What's more I 
> don't need a 
> > computer (or understand FOL) to tell me what it means.
> >  
> > Regards
> >  
> > Matthew
> >
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     *From:* uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     [mailto:uos-convene-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]*On Behalf 
> Of *Mills
> >     Davis
> >     *Sent:* 03 March 2006 13:52
> >     *To:* Upper Ontology Summit convention
> >     *Subject:* Re: [uos-convene] Suggestions for structuring the Tu
> >     Mar 14 meeting
> >
> >     Why not build an ontology?
> >
> 
> 
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
> To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
> Shared Files: 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
> Community Wiki: 
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit
> 
>     (08)

 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uos-convene/
To Post: mailto:uos-convene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/uos-convene/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit    (09)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>