uom-ontology-std
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [uom-ontology-std] Philosophy and Conceptual Choices, was: Re: A me

To: "martin.hepp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <martin.hepp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, uom-ontology-std <uom-ontology-std@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ed Barkmeyer <edbark@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:35:47 -0400
Message-id: <4ABA4053.4010007@xxxxxxxx>
Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
> Dear Pat:
>
> John F. Sowa wrote:
>   
>> PH> There is no evidence for, and considerable pragmatic evidence
>>  > against, the thesis that ontology engineering is improved by
>>  > approaching it with the tools of philosophy, and certainly not
>>  > with the methodologies of contemporary professional philosophy.
>>         (01)

This topic is irrelevant to this exploder.  Please take it to the Onto 
Forum general-purpose exploder.    (02)

-Ed    (03)

-- 
Edward J. Barkmeyer                        Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263                Tel: +1 301-975-3528
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263                FAX: +1 301-975-4694    (04)

"The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST, 
 and have not been reviewed by any Government authority."    (05)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/  
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/  
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>