Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
> Dear Pat:
>
> John F. Sowa wrote:
>
>> PH> There is no evidence for, and considerable pragmatic evidence
>> > against, the thesis that ontology engineering is improved by
>> > approaching it with the tools of philosophy, and certainly not
>> > with the methodologies of contemporary professional philosophy.
>> (01)
This topic is irrelevant to this exploder. Please take it to the Onto
Forum general-purpose exploder. (02)
-Ed (03)
--
Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263 Tel: +1 301-975-3528
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 FAX: +1 301-975-4694 (04)
"The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
and have not been reviewed by any Government authority." (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/uom-ontology-std/
Subscribe: mailto:uom-ontology-std-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/uom-ontology-std/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UoM/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UoM_Ontology_Standard (06)
|