Re: [ontology-based-standards] [iaoa-member] Proceedings: "Ontology-base

[Paul Brandt <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

 

@Peter: thank you for your intervention to off-load this from the original mailing list.

Unfortunately I could not attend the meeting. I am grateful for the proceedings (very useful indeed) and I would like to contribute with the following:

Ad. 1. Ontology-based Standards in the area of Quantities and Units of Measure [PeterYim, FrankOlken?]

Resulting from the PhD-research that I am currently conducting, we have proposed an ontology, ContoExam, to support semantic interoperability in sensor network - sensor applications [1], that addresses not only quantities and their measurements (as defined by the VIM3 [2]) but extends this to include quantities that cannot be expressed in magnitudes, e.g., examinations of properties such as blood type, as proposed by Dybkaer [3]. In addition, we included context [4] since that is highly relevant to support correct interpretation towards the use of the quantity/property.

 

My interest in joining this initiative is:

* Contributing with our ContoExam and finding ways for its improvement

* Contributing to the emergence of a unified *upper* ontology on measurements that includes properties alongside quantities

* Providing the biomedical community with a semantic foundation for expressing medical observations

* Improving (a) the openness, and (b) the evolutionary capability, of sensor networks

Note that this work should be considered "research" and not a standard, or in the process of being standardized. Still both points, i.c., the VIM baseline might prove too narrow, and the need for context, may be pertinent to the mini-series

Best

                Paul

 

Ir. P. (Paul) Brandt (1,2)

1: Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Delft, The Netherlands

2: Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

T +31 (0)88 866 70 56

E paul.brandt@xxxxxx ; p.brandt@xxxxxx

Abstract of our paper [1] - Much effort has been spent on the optimization of sensor networks, mainly concerning their performance and power efficiency. Furthermore, open communication protocols for the exchange of sensor data have been developed and widely adopted, making sensor data widely available for software applications. However, less attention has been given to the interoperability of sensor networks and sensor network applications at a semantic level. This hinders the reuse of sensor networks in different applications and the evolution of existing sensor networks and their applications. The main contribution of this paper is an ontology-based approach and architecture to address this problem. We developed an ontology that covers concepts regarding examinations as well as measurements, including the circumstances in which the examination and measurement have been performed. The underlying architecture secures a loose coupling at the semantic level to facilitate reuse and evolution. The ontology has the potential of supporting not only correct interpretation of sensor data, but also ensuring its appropriate use in accordance with the purpose of a given sensor network application. The ontology has been specialized and applied in a remote patient monitoring example, demonstrating the aforementioned potential in the e-health domain.

 

 [1]         P. Brandt, T. Basten, S. Stuijk, V. Bui, P. de Clercq, L. F. Pires, and M. van Sinderen, “Semantic interoperability in sensor applications”, in 2013 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2013. Proceedings, Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and e-health, IEEE Symposium on (CICARE2013), 2013. (http://www.es.ele.tue.nl/~tbasten/papers/CICARE2013%20-%20Brandt%20et%20al%20-%20Semantic%20interoperability%20in%20sensor%20applications%20-%20final%20version.pdf)

[2]          “JCGM 200 : 2008 International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms ( VIM )”, in Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 2) - International Bureau of Weights and Measures, Paris, France, 2008.

[3]          R. Dybkaer, An Ontology on Property for Physical, Chemical, and Biological Systems. Copenhagen, Denmark: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2004.

[4]          P. Dockhorn Costa, G. Guizzardi, J. A. Almeida, L. F. Pires, and M. van Sinderen, “Situations in Conceptual Modeling of Context”, 10th IEEE Int Ent Dist Obj Comp Conf WS (EDOCW'06), 2006.

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-based-standards/  
Subscribe: mailto:ontology-based-standards-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-based-standards/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologyBasedStandards/  
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologyBasedStandards        (01)