Kurt, (01)
Ref our phone conversation yesterday, we also talked about: (02)
(a) membership category (active vs observer) and date joined. (03)
(b) we didn't arrive at a conclusion on single vs multiple pages; but
we both recognized that higher priority should be assigned to (i)
re-invigorating the forum traffic, and (ii) getting some
review/suggestion activities going for the UBL 0p70 release -- as this
is an opportune time, when UBL is at a point when they are just
planning out/deciding what's next for them. (04)
(c) we didn't manage to cover item 5
<http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-dev/2003-02/msg00001.html#nid012>.
Need to talk to you about that again. (05)
(d) we also didn't have a chance to discuss purple numbers on the pages. (06)
-ppy
-- (07)
Peter P. Yim wrote Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:22:03 -0800:
> Kurt,
>
> Sorry for my delayed response.
>
> 1.
> > Here's a single HTML output of the profiles. It won't take much to
> > split it into multiple files (assuming we still want to deliver
> > that way).
>
> The entire html file is 108 KB now (a marginal size to keep as one page,
> I guess.) If we have twice the membership, I would say, definitely break
> it up. Having individual pages is obviously more scalable. However,
> there are pros and cons either way. At least, keeping everything on one
> page might make it more convenient for people to read up on their fellow
> community members. ... Your call.
>
> 2.
> > Please take a critical look at the formatting. I copied the color
> > pallet from the Ontolog archives and mirror the look-and-feel, a
> > bit.
>
> This is beautiful! I really like it!!
>
> 3. I've uploaded your file (temporarily) to the following:
>
>
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ontolog-admin/survey/data/ontolog0-members/MemberRecords--KurtConrad_20030201a.htm
>
>
>
> Eventually, it (or the bunch of files) should probably go under:
>
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/membership/
>
> 4. I noticed a couple of people (which I added to the list and the
> ontolog_subscriber.xls, but which I did not inform you via email) are
> missing from the list. They are (i) <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxx> Jonathan
> Cheyer, and (ii) <jackpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Jack Park.
> [See
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ontolog-admin/subscriber/ontolog_subscribers.xls
> ]
>
> 5.
> > Here are the URLs that you asked for: .. Centered .. Left .. Right
>
> I need to talk to you again to recall what we were referring to, here.
> I'll call you in a moment.
>
> Regards,
> PPY
> -- (08)
> Kurt Conrad wrote Sat, 01 Feb 2003 00:09:41 -0800:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> Here's a single HTML output of the profiles. It won't take much to
>> split it into multiple files (assuming we still want to deliver that
>> way).
>>
>> Please take a critical look at the formatting. I copied the color
>> pallet from the Ontolog archives and mirror the look-and-feel, a bit.
>>
>> Here are the URLs that you asked for:
>>
>> Centered
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2002-10/msg00035.html
>>
>> Left
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2002-12/msg00001.html
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2002-10/msg00028.html
>>
>> Right
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2002-10/msg00012.html
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/2002-10/msg00001.html
>>
>> /s/ kwc 2003.02.01 00:09 (09)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-dev/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (010)
|