bsp-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

[bsp-forum] Comments on OGC® OWS-6 Outdoor and Indoor 3D Routing Service

To: "akiko.sato.td@xxxxxxxxxxx" <akiko.sato.td@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Carl Reed <creed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bsp-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "steve@xxxxxxxxxxx" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "bobsmithttl@xxxxxxxxx" <bobsmithttl@xxxxxxxxx>
From: "MacPherson, Deborah" <dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:46:52 -0400
Message-id: <43F2A07F08761449ABD2C0664C74D9FC12DCE80E5B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear Akiko Sato and Carl Reed

 

The following comments are offered on OGC® OWS-6 Outdoor and Indoor 3D Routing Services Engineering Report, specifically from the building / inside environment perspective.

 

Although there is still quite a bit of work ahead in standard exchanges, Building Information Models (BIM) should be able to extract basic geometry for indoor routing.

·         Stephen Hagan with GSA has excellent examples using BIM to quickly calculate every possible route through complex buildings such as courthouses.

·         Deke Smith with BSA has examples of moving a dot through a process plant 5'-6" off the floor (to represent a person's head) to make sure it is possible to walk between all the pipelines, up catwalks and so forth to ensure each area can be serviced. 

·         John Bateman with the University of Bremen Germany work in human spatial cognition and mobile robot navigation may be relevant to your project.

 

Figures 1, 6 and 7 are difficult to read or distinguish between the outdoor and indoor environments. Color versus black and white or other simple display technique should be used to clarify.

 

Figures 2 to 4 should be overlays to more detailed building documentation (rather than trying to recreate building representations).  There are many inaccuracies - wall thickness is not evident, doors appear solid rather than a void, vertical circulation is not indicated.

 

Rather than spending time re-drawing or re-modeling buildings for indoor routing, perhaps the BIM created for the OGC AECOO Testbed (Architect, Engineer, Contractor, Owner, Operator) could be able to be adapted and reused. This model was created to analyze cost and energy efficiency implications through optimization of the building geometry and products (smaller windows, better glass, site orientation with weather patterns).

 

Currently, BIM models do not have a standardized way to be placed and stay linked to geospatial data (ie building models only float, as shown in figures 10 and 11).

 

A common point of reference needs to be defined for any building to be in the right location and turned the right direction.  Civil engineers may refer to this reference point as a "benchmark". The northwest corner is an example of a typical point on any building that could be used. In a conference call between OmniClass development committee and Raj Singh at OGC, even a round building could have one point on a door frame that could qualify as a valid point.

 

Comments on WMS/GetMap parameters are:

"Building" should change to "Facility" because building is both a noun and a verb which causes other problems.

"Space" should be added for interior rooms

Equipment and sensor parameters could be useful for locating activities in a space, floor, or facility.

 

The CityGML schema for Building upon which this paper is based could refer to OmniClass for facility and space class and function types, pre-organized in logical groups based on construction, occupancy, and other factors important to the building industry. Year of construction and demolition are likely to reside in city permit offices. Measured height can be tricky and even contentious, again, a common point of reference is required for measured height to be accurate.

 

More information is requested on XML file BuildingUsageType.xml. The CityGML building schema could easily link to parallel standards in the architecture and engineering domain if an appropriate set of attributes can be mapped over. A great deal of information about WallSurface Type, OpeningProperties etc can be extracted or referenced from building models. Please confirm this is what is meant by "...generated this building model complying with the baseline of CityGML specifications while the most of non-geometric related information and features are intended to be vacant for further modifications by other applications."

 

An LOD5 model will be needed for the Open Floor Plan project because fire alarm sensors and fire service equipment need to be included.

 

If building data can be linked spatially to other buildings and regions, it is very possible gbXML can be used to mediate data to and from temperature sensors for longer term energy studies in addition to applications noted above for public safety, leasing, and finding your way through a building on a cell phone.

 

Sincerely

 

Deborah MacPherson



Deborah MacPherson

Specifications and Research

 

Cannon Design

1100 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 2900

Arlington, Virginia 22209

 

Direct Line 703 907 2353

4 Digit Dial 2353

 

ü Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/bsp-forum/   
Subscribe: mailto:bsp-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/bsp-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/BSP/ 
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BuildingServicePerformance    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [bsp-forum] Comments on OGC® OWS-6 Outdoor and Indoor 3D Routing Services Engineering Report, MacPherson, Deborah <=