ppy/oor-socop_chat-transcript_unedited_20131112a.txt ------ Chat transcript from room: oor_20131112 2013-11-12 GMT-08:00 [PST] ------ [6:55] PeterYim: Welcome to the = OpenOntologyRepository: OOR Infrastructure Meeting - Tue 2013_11_12 = Topic: OOR Infrastructure Discussion: "SOCoP-OOR and related issues" Co-chairs: KenBaclawski, MikeDean & TillMossakowski session page: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR/ConferenceCall_2013_11_12 . == Proceedings: == . [7:00] List of members: KenBaclawski, OliverKutz, PeterYim, TillMossakowski [7:01] PeterYim: Till: needs to leave in 30 minutes; [7:01] PeterYim: Ken: need to leave in an hour too [7:04] PeterYim: == KenBaclawski, MikeDean & TillMossakowski starts the meeting ... [7:06] PeterYim: OOR instances & SOCoP-OOR see: http://oor.net/index1.html & http://socop.oor.net/ontologies [7:09] Gary Berg-Cross: @Peter Does your retirement mean that CIM3 will no longer be involved? [7:11] PeterYim: so far, we don't know what caused the Oct-22 SOCoP-OOR crashing (and another subsequent crash after rebooting) [7:14] PeterYim: @Gary - I am just starting to plan that (and is just giving people ample notice) ... nothing is assumed yet, and it is not happening in, at least, another 6 (or 12) months [7:14] TillMossakowski: BioPortal at Ontohub: http://develop.ontohub.org/bioportal [7:14] Gary Berg-Cross: Note that Stephen M Richard from Arizona loaded IUGS CGI Consolidation Degree Term Vocabulary (consoldeg)in Pct. ALso Simon Cox loaded his O & M ontology in Sept and got a parsing error. These are people that I talked to about the OOR and so they tried to load things to test it out. [7:17] PeterYim: Till: we have imported all the BioPortal ontologies onto Ontohub already; we can do that for the SOCoP-OOR content as well [7:18] PeterYim: Till: we plan to run multiple instances of Ontohub ... look under the "Repositories" tab - at http://develop.ontohub.org/repositories [7:19] TillMossakowski: Note that there are multiple repositories *within* one instance of Ontohub [7:20] TillMossakowski: IS the BioPortal API available also for the Socop instance? [7:25] MikeDean: The BioPortal version used for SOCoP still uses Protege 3 code. If you get a loading error, try loading the ontology into Protege 3. [7:26] TillMossakowski: The BioPortal API is available under http://rest.bioontology.org/bioportal/ontologies?apikey=YourAPIKey . How do I translate this into socop.oor.net ? [7:27] PeterYim: does this work? http://socop.oor.net/ontologies?apikey=YourAPIKey [7:28] PeterYim: Till: No ... Ken: I'll get back to you [7:30] Gary Berg-Cross: Till Would your propose running the SOCoP repository as a separate instance? [7:30] Gary Berg-Cross: No I haven [7:30] TillMossakowski: sorry, have to leave now [7:30] Gary Berg-Cross: t been in touch with Peter Fox. [7:31] PeterYim: question for the SOCoP principals - are you in touch with the ESIP people? [7:32] PeterYim: Ref: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/socop-forum/2013-05/msg00005.html#nid07 [7:32] PeterYim: ESIP = Earth Science International Partners [7:33] PeterYim: SIP-Portal = the Federation of Earth Science Information Partnerss ESIP-Portal. ESIP-Portal is a a customized version of the National Center for Biomedical Ontologys BioPortal application, and is used for accessing and sharing Earth Science ontologies. run by Foundation for Earth Science [7:33] PeterYim: see: http://semanticportal.esipfed.org/ontologies [7:34] PeterYim: ^"SIP-Portal" should read: "ESIP-Portal" [7:40] PeterYim: as far as I undestand, one main focus of Ontohub is to implement OntoIOp (Ontology, Model and Specification Integration and Interoperability) - see: http://ontoiop.org (or http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntoIOp ) [7:44] PeterYim: [action] GaryBergCross to work with MikDean (offline) to get access to the SOCoP-OOR admin interface [7:45] PeterYim: [action] Ken will work with Till to mirror the SOCoP-OOR content over to Ontohub [7:47] KenBaclawski: Detailed report Use of non-absolute IRI Domain <_:genid634989> [in ontology OntologyID(OntologyIRI() VersionIRI())] Use of non-absolute IRI Domain <_:genid635005> [in ontology OntologyID(OntologyIRI() VersionIRI())] Use of non-absolute IRI Domain <_:genid635011> [in ontology OntologyID(OntologyIRI() VersionIRI())] [7:47] KenBaclawski: These are the errors reported by OWL Validator. [7:48] PeterYim: Gary / Nancy - do not move "WisLandUseCodes (WisLandUseCodes)" (Nancy: don't want to go public with this yet) and "Observations and Measurements (OM)" (Gary: while it still has parsing error) [7:53] PeterYim: still need to address the IPR issues, and gatekeeper to enforce the OOR-IPR Policy ( ref. http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository#nid2JR7 ) [7:56] KenBaclawski: I checked IUGS CGI Lithology ontology with OWL Validator and it is valid, so it should not have a problem at OntoHUB. [7:57] PeterYim: ^OOR-IPR Policy - see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository_IPR#nid2L0S [7:58] PeterYim: as a reference COLORE is now using: http://code.google.com/p/colore/ - Code license: Apache License 2.0 ; Content license: Creative Commons 3.0 BY-SA [7:58] PeterYim: Ontohub, I believe, is on AGPL (for code) [7:59] PeterYim: I am negotiating with both MichaelGruninger and TillMossakowski about the possibility of changing their licenses to align with the OOR-IPR Policy [8:00] PeterYim: BioPortal has changed (from a Mozilla License) to be a fully OOR-IPR Policy compliant set of licenses [8:04] PeterYim: from the outset (2008 Ontology Summit), the OOR Initiative does support both "open" and "non-open" content ... so, we *need to be clear* [8:05] PeterYim: ^^[7:47] KenBaclawski: (validator error messages regarding the version of "Observations and Measurements (OM)" on the SOCoP-OOR now [8:07] Gary Berg-Cross: Mike...nancy... We will have to address some of these issues/lessons learned about maintenance and porting in our NSF report. [8:08] PeterYim: Aleksandra: we will have the option on Ontohub to support ontologies that can be openly accessed, and ones with "limited access" ... that should be in place in a week or two ... this is part of the preparation for the FOIS competition too [8:08] MikeDean: OOR should be able to (optionally) accommodate ontologies with different IPR rights within a single repository. [8:11] Gary Berg-Cross: @Aleksandra This model of different domains for ontologies sounds very useful and would accomodate a place for our geospatial topics. [8:13] Gary Berg-Cross: One question if we port our ontologies there would be how to help develop, manage and administer our part - or would OntoHub assume all of these duties.... [8:13] Gary Berg-Cross: Mike, do you think that NSF would have any issues with some of the products of their supported work going overseas??? [8:16] PeterYim: ^"Mike" -> "Mike, Nancy et al." [8:23] PeterYim: something to think about: implementing the next ncbo-vm release (triple-store-based; probably in the next month or so) on the Amazon cloud ... we should see whether we can round up the resources to do it [8:26] Gary Berg-Cross: Peter/Mike when do you think the SOCoP OOR would go away do to lack of funding? [8:26] Gary Berg-Cross: I wom [8:26] Gary Berg-Cross: I wo [8:27] Gary Berg-Cross: I won't have time till December to consider some new work.. [8:28] PeterYim: @Gary - if SOCoP-OOR is going away, it is not for lack of funding (it is "not funded" for a while already) [8:28] PeterYim: good meeting! [8:29] MikeDean: Thanks everyone! [8:29] PeterYim: Peter will follow-up with Ken & Till ref. the focus of next Tuesday's OOR-Hackathon (n.05 - Tue 2013.11.19) [8:30] PeterYim: -- session ended: 8:29am PST -- [8:30] List of attendees: AleksandraSojic, DaliaVaranka, Gary Berg-Cross, KenBaclawski, MikeDean, OliverKutz, PeterYim, TillMossakowski, ToddSchneider [8:31] Sent transcript to: mossakow@iws.cs.uni-magdeburg.de [8:31] Sent transcript to: kenb@ccs.neu.edu [8:32] Sent transcript to: mdean@bbn.com [8:32] Sent transcript to: gbergcross@gmail.com [8:33] Sent transcript to: lobrst@mitre.org [8:33] Sent transcript to: ppy@cim.us [8:33] Sent transcript to: wiegand@cs.wisc.edu [8:55] AleksandraSojic: an important point regarding stability of Ontohub. Since Ontohub is built on a git structure, it has separate branches for development and staging. So, nothing is submitted to the staging (and master, i.e. visible website) unless it is stable to be merged to it. In that way, while the development is taking place on develop.ontohub.org, the UI on the main page is always stable. ------