ppy/oor_chat-transcript_edited_20131105b.txt



------
Chat transcript from room: oor_20131105
2013-11-05 GMT-08:00 [PST]
------


[6:54] PeterYim: Welcome to the 

 = OpenOntologyRepository: Project Team Member Meeting - Tue 2013_11_05 =

This is a regular monthly planning & admin Conference Call

session page: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OOR/ConferenceCall_2013_11_05


Attendees: KenBaclawski (chair), MichaelGruninger, PeterYim (scribe), ToddSchneider


.
 == Proceedings: ==

.

[6:57] KenBaclawski: Good morning!

[6:58] PeterYim: Hi Ken ... don't see you on the phone bridge yet!?

[7:02] KenBaclawski: re: potential collaborators - take a look at: Asset Description Metadata Schema (ADMS) - https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/home

[7:05] PeterYim: Ken: this was previously mentioned in one of JeanneHolm's talks

[7:--] MichaelGruninger / PeterYim: see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset_Description_Metadata_Schema & www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/?

[7:05] PeterYim: Michael: I'll be at the ISO sc32 / 11179 meeting shortly, and can see what they think about this too

[7:13] PeterYim / KenBaclawski: they run a repository/registry too - see also https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms/asset_release/adms#download-links ... and it's even federated!

[7:16] KenBaclawski: Another related standard is Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), which does not claim to be a data model at all, yet has some good ideas and it can easily be translated to UML.  http://www.ifla.org/node/949

[7:18] KenBaclawski: see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records

[7:27] KenBaclawski: How do we determine the requirements and then determine the extent to which these other communities have resources we can use. Perhaps a hackathon?

[7:59] PeterYim: == re SOCoP-OOR issue

[8:02] PeterYim: this SOCoP-OOR instance has been down since Oct-22, and it's still not recovered yet ... reflecting huge issues we are having in hosting and maintaining BioPortal-based OOR instances (now, and more so in the future)

[8:02] PeterYim / KenBaclawski: we will address the SOCoP-OOR instance next Monday (Nov-11, when we can meet with ShinyaYamada and TejasParikh, when both of them are back from their traveling) and follow-up from there

[8:03] PeterYim: whether or not we should continue to support a SOCoP-OOR instance ... or more generically, the various BioPortal-based OOR instances in the long run, should be discussed (not today)

[8:03] PeterYim: we also need to find out if SOCoP have plans or resources to continue supporting a SOCoP-OOR, especially in view of the RPI's plan to stand up a similar ontology repository (with collaboration/support from Stanford too)

[8:04] PeterYim: Peter also announced plans to start paring down support activities in anticipation of his retirement (possibly in 6~12 months)

[8:06] PeterYim: @Ken: I still need a session plan from you and Till for the Nov-12 OOR-Hackathon n.05 ... please advise.

[8:22] KenBaclawski: I will check with Till.  Thanks for reminding me.

[8:05] PeterYim: -- session ended: 8:03am PST --

------