Difference (from revision 14 to 15)

Changed: 60,61c60,61

* _ took the chair and welcomed everyone {nid 1CBZ}
* _ volunteered to take minutes of the meeting {nid 1CC0}
* MichelleRaymond took the chair and welcomed everyone {nid 1CBZ}
* RaviSharma volunteered to take minutes of the meeting {nid 1CC0}

Changed: 68,71c68

Michelle chaired the meeting and Ravi agreed to take notes.
Michelle:
Mark and Leo will be providing details of how champions will be providing the Communique'.
Need to talk about time each group needs, at least half of the time be for discussions, based on breadth and depth of discussions. How much time for 4 major sections for presentation and rest for Q&A. Champions can summarize or minipanel approach. For OOR Architecture Michelle's (and Ravi agrees) suggestion is that we present a couple of different frameworks and related architecture issues as examples. Similarly other Champions please think about your areas. {nid 1CCJ}
Ties to the Program Planners and F2F-Program Agenda {nid 1CD2}

Changed: 73,74c70,72

Leo suggested:
Short synapsis and starting position modified slightly by session chairs would help. {nid 1CCK}
* Tie to Communique'and F2F Program {nid 1CD3}
** Michelle: {nid 1CD4}
** Mark and Leo will provide details of how champions will provide content for the Communique'. {nid 1CD5}

Changed: 76,77c74,88

Fabian:
Next day final version of final docuement of Summit may be a way of reaching consensus. {nid 1CCL}
* {nid 1CD6}
** Michelle: {nid 1CD7}
** Need to talk about time each group needs at the F2F for content summary and discussion. {nid 1CD8}
** Suggestion from the Organizing Committee is at least half of the time be for discussions, based on breadth and depth of discussions. {nid 1CD9}
** Champions can summarize or minipanel approach for presentations. {nid 1CDA}
** For OOR Architecture Michelle's (and Ravi agrees) suggestion is that we present a couple of different frameworks and related architecture issues as examples. {nid 1CDB}
** Fabian: {nid 1CDC}
** Concern that a panel approach may rehash thread conversations instead of bringing together concenses. {nid 1CDD}
** Leo suggested: {nid 1CDE}
** Short synopsis and starting position modified slightly by session chairs would help start off a Topic Session. {nid 1CDF}
** Fabian: {nid 1CDG}
** On the second day if there are session "recaps" given by the session chair, those will feed into a final version of final document of Summit and may be a way of reaching consensus. {nid 1CDH}
** Leo: {nid 1CDI}
** While individuals are updating the Topic Wiki Page's with individual contributions from the group, provide not just threads but a summary. The summary in the Wiki can be incorporated in the Communique' {nid 1CDJ}
** The summary needs to be ready earlier than the F2F, by a week. {nid 1CDK}

Changed: 79c90,99

Leo: I agree. Mark and Leo will put out a structure. Individuals are updating Wiki Page Individual contributions from the group in Wiki that can be incorporated in the Communique' not just threads but a summary. {nid 1CCM}
* F2F Session lengths and starting time {nid 1CDL}
** Michelle: {nid 1CDM}
** How much time should be used for each of the 4 major sections presentations? {nid 1CDN}
** ?: {nid 1CDO}
** The F2F draft agenda has different lengths of time for different topics. The first session is squeezed into 1 hour. {nid 1CDP}
** Peter: {nid 1CDQ}
** This is due to a NIST policy of not being able to serve refreshments until a conference has started. It can be served at a break, but not prior to the start. {nid 1CDR}
** ?: {nid 1CDS}
** Start at 8am instead of 8:30 am and thus have time for a longer session before the "break" and refreshments. {nid 1CDT}
** Action: Peter will ask Steve Ray about having an 8am start time. {nid 1CDU}

Changed: 81,82c101,104

Leo: Individual chamnpions will capture non-controversial topic related synopsis.
Leo and Mark want the summary to be ready earlier. {nid 1CCN}
* Communique {nid 1CDV}
** Leo: {nid 1CDW}
** Will contain four Sections of intellectual content and one for Second day OOR summary. That takes us through what we have done towards realizing an OOR. {nid 1CDX}
** The Topic summaries and sections need to be ready earlier than the F2F, by a week. {nid 1CDY}

Removed: 84,93d105

Leo:
Four Sections Intellectual content and one for Second day OOR summary that takes us through what we have done towards realizing it. {nid 1CCP}

Michelle: Closely moderated session by champions and direct the discourse to keep it focussed by a panel to focus on a communique' section. Peter suggested as to Why it is in the communique'.
Michelle:
Last Communique' has been typically 2 pages, say half page from each section.
Leo: Yes it is a good goal, but can be say expanded to five pages.
Fabian: Few sentaences would be hard.
Leo and Michelle suggested to look at Communique' from last Summit. {nid 1CCQ}

Added: 108a121,123


* Mark and Leo will put out a structure for the champions to provide Communique' content. {nid 1CDZ}
* Peter will ask Steve Ray about having an 8am start time. {nid 1CE0}