Difference (from revision 2 to 3)
Changed: 1,10c1,6
|
= FerencKovacs {nid 1IX1} = see: http://www.firkasz.com/ {nid 1IX2} I have been in the language business for 30 years acting as a professional translator from Hungarian into English and vice versa. As a by-product of my main engagement in teaching I designed and patented a computer assisted language laboratory which was designed to foster heterogenous group learning and running exams. I also designed a DOS based factual/textual data base management program, the main use of which was to build multilingual dictionaries in a cooperative group work fashion. Recently, I studied a number of disciplines to see how their basic categories may be vetted in terms of the categories used by other disciplines and I found that instead of ontology, we need to have a study of a genesis (Genezistan) that can replace current ontologies and integrate the various disciplines in a different type of dynamic upper level ontology. Since I have found the grains of such a product I have become interested in sharing this knowledge with other people, especially with those who are working to develop MT and TM products. In my view they are mounted on the horse with their face back, and would never succeed using statistical methods or current ontologies for that matter. {nid 1IX3} My view of the road to Genezistan is summarised as follows: {nid 1IX4} The solution of the problem of defining a common set of core ontology vocabulary elements and a shared world model will offer a solution to NLP problems for Machine Translation purposes. Besides, a different (dynamic) approach to knowledge representation (query and retrieval languages) for library classification purposes is to emerge as a result of the implementation of a new paradigm to describe the integrated human achievement in the fields of Philosophy, Psychology, Linguistics, Non Formal Logic, Cognitive Science and Computer Science with an aim to have a common understanding of reality. The outline of such an integrated approach called Genezistan is to be presented here soon with examples of how thinking and thought processes may be broken down into smaller chunks of operations tha {nid 1IXA} |
|
<h2><a name="nid1IX1" id="nid1IX1"></a><a href="http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?FerencKovacs" class="wikiword">FerencKovacs</a> <a class="nid" title="1IX1" href="#nid1IX1">(1IX1)</a></h2> <p><a name="nid1IX2" id="nid1IX2"></a>see: <a href="http://www.firkasz.com/" class="extlink">http://www.firkasz.com/</a> <a class="nid" title="1IX2" href="#nid1IX2">(1IX2)</a></p> <p><a name="nid1IX3" id="nid1IX3"></a>I have been in the language business for 30 years acting as a professional translator from Hungarian into English and vice versa. As a by-product of my main engagement in teaching I designed and patented a computer assisted language laboratory which was designed to foster heterogenous group learning and running exams. I also designed a DOS based factual/textual data base management program, the main use of which was to build multilingual dictionaries in a cooperative group work fashion. Recently, I studied a number of disciplines to see how their basic categories may be vetted in terms of the categories used by other disciplines and I found that instead of ontology, we need to have a study of a genesis (Genezistan) that can replace current ontologies and integrate the various disciplines in a different type of dynamic upper level ontology. Since I have found the grains of such a product I have become interested in sharing this knowledge with other people, especially with those who are working to develop MT and TM products. In my view they are mounted on the horse with their face back, and would never succeed using statistical methods or current ontologies for that matter. <a class="nid" title="1IX3" href="#nid1IX3">(1IX3)</a></p> <p><a name="nid1IX4" id="nid1IX4"></a>My view of the road to Genezistan is summarised as follows: <a class="nid" title="1IX4" href="#nid1IX4">(1IX4)</a></p> <p><a name="nid1IXA" id="nid1IXA"></a>The solution of the problem of defining a common set of core ontology vocabulary elements and a shared world model will offer a solution to NLP problems for Machine Translation purposes. Besides, a different (dynamic) approach to knowledge representation (query and retrieval languages) for library classification purposes is to emerge as a result of the implementation of a new paradigm to describe the integrated human achievement in the fields of Philosophy, Psychology, Linguistics, Non Formal Logic, Cognitive Science and Computer Science with an aim to have a common understanding of reality. The outline of such an integrated approach called Genezistan is to be presented here soon with examples of how thinking and thought processes may be broken down into smaller chunks of operations tha <a class="nid" title="1IXA" href="#nid1IXA">(1IXA)</a></p> {nid 1IXC} |