Difference (from revision 18 to 19)
Changed: 21,25c21,27
|
Among the changes • Information Sharing is no longer optional, from radio frequencies to secure, trusted networks, and more/improved ISACs are imperative; • Recognizing Fail-Points needs to be completely, unconditionally, accepted instead of avoided; • Interoperability and SOA must rise above both the current level of apparent marketing acceptance and exploitation with vendor-specific packaging, and adhere to increasing levels of inter-vendor interoperability based on standard vocabularies and data models expressed in XML and RDF-OWL; • Recognizing Fail-Points and achieving interoperability must be done in highly adaptable, SCALABLE methodologies. {nid S82} |
|
Among the changes {nid S8E} * {nid S8F} ** Information Sharing is no longer optional, from radio frequencies to secure, trusted networks, and more/improved ISACs are imperative; {nid S8G} ** Recognizing Fail-Points needs to be completely, unconditionally, accepted instead of avoided; {nid S8H} ** Interoperability and SOA must rise above both the current level of apparent marketing acceptance and exploitation with vendor-specific packaging, and adhere to increasing levels of inter-vendor interoperability based on standard vocabularies and data models expressed in XML and RDF-OWL; {nid S8I} ** Recognizing Fail-Points and achieving interoperability must be done in highly adaptable, SCALABLE methodologies. {nid S82} |